___________________________ Name of Presenter | Consider for Pi Mu Epsilon prize | ||
___________________________ Institution | Consider for SIAM prize | ||
___________________________ Length of Talk | Consider for AWM prize |
5 Exemplary (one of the best student papers I have ever heard)
4 Excellent (strong candidate for an award; comparable to past award winners)
3 Good (possible candidate for an award)
2 Adequate (probably not a candidate for an award)
1 Not recommended for an award
A________ Topic and Level [appropriateness for anticipated audience]
B________ Organization/Preparation [structure; depth and breadth of allotted time]
C________ Presentation [diction; clarity; pace; enthusiasm; rapport with audience]
D________ Understanding [command of subject; responsiveness to questions]
E________ Use of visual aids and/or chalkboard [readability; complementarity with oral presentation]
F________ Exposition: [general interest in subject; integration of ideas; scope]
Or Research: [quality; originality in content and/or approach]
________ Total Score
Please put constructive critcism to student on back of page and it will be shared with the student. Remarks on the front of the page will remain confidential.
Remarks to consider in judging: