Table of Contents

Part Five: 2016-2017 Academic Year and Beyond

Changing Instruction

The changes to courses included eliminating the modern physics course, the second quarter of the electronics course, and the mathematical methods and classical mechanics capstone courses, reconfiguring the junior-year paradigms in physics courses from 9 three-week courses into 6 five-week courses, realigning the computational courses with the revised junior-level paradigms in physics courses, embedding mathematics instruction within all of the junior-level paradigms courses, and developing two new sophomore courses to bridge between the introductory physics courses and the paradigms in physics courses. Still needing discussion and possible revision were the remaining senior level capstone courses as well as possible development of an advanced laboratory course and specialty courses. Faculty involved in implementing the new plan offered the following advice for others implementing similar curricular reforms.

The Paradigms 2.0 Committee identified the following steps to embed just-in-time mathematics instruction in upper-level science courses

The Paradigms 2.0 Committee identified the following steps to develop new sophomore courses to bridge between introductory and upper-level courses

Design and implementation of Math Bits:

Distinguish between the mathematics needed to graduate as a science major and that needed for graduate study in the discipline

Assign a separate instructor for teaching “math bits” within a science course

Maintain a commitment to generalizing the mathematics

Recognize that “math bits” scheduling needs are different for different courses. For example:

Plan collaboratively with the primary instructor of the science course

Be both flexible and firm with colleagues

Establish an effective routine for sharing homework assignments.

Respect time issues

Listen and respond to the primary instructor’s requests when feasible

Inform faculty about “math bits” plans and engage them in talking substantively about mathematics content during some upper division curriculum meetings

Enjoy learning new mathematics yourself

Design and implementation of a course that teaches science in the context of contemporary challenges

Motivate students by connecting fundamental science with current societal issues

Create a coherent narrative

Gather and synthesize information from diverse sources

Match the level of instruction to students’ capabilities

Create homework sets that emphasize “thinking like a scientist”

Integrate laboratory experiences within the course

Design intriguing demonstrations

Foster student engagement during class sessions

Communicate clear guidelines for a term paper assignment

Seek student feedback in multiple ways

Use technology to enhance instruction

Design and implementation of a course that teaches science with an emphasis on sense making

Think about three kinds of goals: science content goals, math content goals, and sense-making goals. Consider:

Think about how to embed sense-making goals in all aspects of the course. Consider:

Think about how to assess sense-making skills at the beginning and end of the term

Think about how to scaffold and then fade instruction in sense making

Think about how to build on prior courses and prepare for later courses

Think about what content to cover when combining multiple courses into one. Consider:

Do a lot of thinking about what will happen during Week 1, because this first week sets the tone for the rest of the course

During first week of class, do a variety of active engagement strategies to set the tone for the rest of the term

During first day of class, attend to administrative details related to using active engagement strategies

Be aware of and plan ways to mitigate as well as utilize a wide range of experience and preparation among the students, particularly if some are still completing the introductory series and others are transfer students already enrolled in upper-level courses.

Focus upon the reasoning part of a solution during small group problem-solving activities

Invite small groups to report out their answers and to talk about strategies they used to look for mistakes as well as to build confidence in their answers

Early in the course, include explicit sense-making prompts on worksheets setting up small group problem-solving activities in class and on homework. Ask students, for example:

Be sure grading of the homework provides feedback on the sense-making aspects of a problem.

Listen closely to what students are saying in their small groups and during class discussions to learn more about how they are thinking

When working a problem on the board, ask students what to do next

During office hours, engage students in working problems together; be a resource for them as they help one another rather than doing all the talking

Be aware of language issues for students who are not native speakers

Meet before each class with assistant(s) to discuss their impressions of the previous class, plan the upcoming class, and discuss ways to improve those plans

After a few weeks in the course, ask for direct student feedback with an anonymous survey

As course progresses, consider whether choices of subject matter and/or resources to include are appropriate and whether topics thought to be important for later courses are really necessary to be addressed in this one

Recognize one’s own limitations in launching a new complex endeavor

Reflect often and keep a record for oneself