Students should be able to:
Link to Calculating a Total Differential Activity
Activity Highlights
Link to Upside Down Derivatives Activity
Activity Highlights
Link to Cyclic Chain Rule Activity
Activity Highlights
Link to Isowidth and Isoforce Stretchability Activity
Activity Highlights
Link to Easy and Hard Derivatives Activity
Activity Highlights
Link to Dividing by Differentials Activity
Activity Highlights
Chain Rule Diagrams (Lecture: 20 min)
New Surfaces activity - "Squishability" of Water Vapor (SGA - 20 min)
For each of the sets of functions below, draw a chain rule diagram for the indicated derivative and use it to write a chain rule, then evaluate your chain rule to find the derivative.
Find $\left( \frac{dg}{dt} \right)$ for $g = (a + b)^2$, $a = \sin 2t$, and $b = t^{3/2}$.
Find $\left( \frac{\partial h}{\partial v} \right)_u$ for $h = \sqrt{a - b}$, $a = uv^2 - 1/v$, and $b = \frac{uv}{u + v}$.
Find $\left( \frac{\partial A}{\partial B} \right)_F$ for $A(B,C)$ and $F(B,C)$. (Of course, you don't have to evaluate this derivative!)
A possible equation of state for a gas takes the form $$pV=N k_B T \exp\left(-\frac{\alpha V}{N k_B T}\right)$$ in which $\alpha$, $N$, and $k_B$ are constants. Calculate expressions for: $$\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial V}\right)_T\qquad\qquad \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_p\qquad\qquad \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial p}\right)_V$$ and show that these derivatives satisfy the cyclic chain rule.
Paramagnetism\hfill\break We have the following equations of state for the total magnetization $M$, and the entropy $S$ of a paramagnetic system: \begin{eqnarray*} M&=&N\mu\, \frac{e^{\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}} - e^{-\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}}} {e^{\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}} + e^{-\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}}}\\ \noalign{\smallskip} S&=&Nk_B\left\{\ln 2 + \ln \left(e^{\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}}+e^{-\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}}\right) +\frac{\mu B}{k_B T} \frac{e^{\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}} - e^{-\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}}} {e^{\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}} + e^{-\frac{\mu B}{k_B T}}} \right\}\\ \end{eqnarray*}
Solve for the magnetic susceptibility, which is defined as: $$\chi_B=\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial B}\right)_T $$
Also solve for almost the same derivative, now taken with the entropy $S$ held constant: $$\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial B}\right)_S $$
Why does this second derivative turn out to be zero?
Sense-making: solve explicitly for the chain rule that allows you to evaluate $$\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial B}\right)_S $$ using both total differentials (zapping with d) and a chain rule diagram. (Your chain rule should be the same!)